IRS Circumvents “Statute of Limitations”

| Federal Income Tax, IRS, News, Real Life Stories

Three letters arrived from the IRS within a week of each other. On the one hand this is rather exciting since the IRS has been quiet for the last few years, and I haven’t had much to report as far as consequences of refusal to pay. At the same time, it could take months of correspondence to sort out what they’ve done.

I am self-employed and file and refuse to pay the federal income tax to the feds although I redirect it to good causes. But I have been paying the Social Security/self-employment tax. (For the 2019 form 1040, the federal tax was line 12 and the self-employment tax was line 15.)

The Notice CP23 that arrived at my door was titled “Changes to your 2019 Form 1040,” and the IRS made some income adjustment but the bottom line for any tax due didn’t change. The part that was annoying about this letter was the $435 “Failure-to-file” penalty, which seemed a bit odd since they were correcting the form that they had obviously received. I have never sent my forms by certified mail, so I have no proof of the date I filed but I am contesting this penalty.

The next two letters arrived together a few days later and were somewhat more mysterious. It took me a while to sort out what the IRS had done. These were both Notice CP62, one for Tax Year 2011 and one for Tax Year 2012. The title on the letters says “We’ve applied your payment to your account.” Each letter showed a new amount due for that tax year. On the back was a list of “payments credited to your account.”

What the IRS did was take my estimated or final payments for Social Security/self-employment tax for Tax Year 2020 and apply those payments to 2011 and 2012 debts they say I owe.

This seems to be an improper (perhaps illegal?) effort by the IRS to circumvent the 10-year statute of limitations on collecting debt for those of us who file and refuse to pay.

I asked Lincoln at the NWTRCC office if he had seen anything about this, and he helpfully replied:

My understanding from court cases I’ve seen over the last few years (via Checkpoint Newsstand) is that the IRS can choose to apply funds to any tax year they want IF they collect the funds from you involuntarily. But if you are making a voluntary payment, which you were doing, then it’s your choice to choose to which year you want a payment applied. The cases I have seen were always rich people bringing the IRS to court over how the IRS applied involuntarily collected funds, so the plaintiffs always lost, but that’s how I heard about this issue.

And then he followed up with this find regarding “payment designation”:

Rev. Rul. 73-305, 1973-2 C.B. 43, holds that partial payments of assessed tax, penalty, and interest are to be applied as the taxpayer designates. If the taxpayer fails to give specific instructions as to the application of the partial payment voluntarily tendered, the amount of such payment will be applied by the Service to tax, penalty, and interest, in that order, for the earliest period, then to tax, penalty, and interest, in that order, for the next succeeding period, until the payment is absorbed.

The Supreme Court has stated: “IRS policy permits taxpayers who ‘voluntarily’ submit payments to the IRS to designate the tax liability to which the payment will apply.” United States v. Energy Res. Co., 495 U.S. 545, 548 (1990); see Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. 238, 252 n.15 (1978) (noting exception where payment “results from enforced collection methods”).

I have written a letter to the IRS at the Kansas City office that generated these notices asking for the late filing penalty to be removed and then listing the payments that they misapplied and asking them to be correctly applied to 2020.

It might take ages to sort this out, so stay tuned for future reports, but if any readers have had this experience, please tell your story in the comments or feel free to email me.

Despite the potential hassles dealing with this, I am reminded of a pair of war tax resisters from years back who got a notice from the IRS and were thrilled. They had not heard anything for the first couple years of their resistance and felt they were being ignored. When I get nervous about seeing that distinctive envelope in the mailbox I remember them and it makes me smile. Resistance comes with consequences; we just hope that someday one of the consequences will be total redirection of the Pentagon budget to life not death.

— Post by Ruth Benn

4 thoughts on “IRS Circumvents “Statute of Limitations””

  1. Larry Bassett says:

    I always try to remember that civil disobedience does come with consequences and part of the active disobedience is accepting those consequences. One negative consequence is having to try to understand IRS rules and regulations and actions! One of the worst things I have working in the WTR movement is being forced to become some thing of an IRS technical expert. But I would certainly have been enraged if the IRS took my money voluntarily paid to go to Social Security and Medicare to pay my Federal income tax.

  2. Karl Meyer says:

    I’ve never had this problem, as I don’t file, and don’t make voluntary payments (except for the 2001 tax year, when I became eligible for Social Security, had $12.38 in income for my involuntary servitude at a “Federal Correctional Institution”, and less than $600 of income for the other six months of the year, did file, paid the Social Security tax, and got a low income allowance negative tax back. ) Karl Meyer

  3. Erica says:

    The IRS is being tricky! Looking forward to hearing how this gets resolved (though as I know people who still haven’t gotten last year’s stimulus check, I imagine it’s not going to be quick). All the best!

  4. Chrissy Kirchhoefer says:

    Thanks for sharing Ruth! What a great reminder of the many forms that redirection takes- away from fear and towards life.

Comments are closed.