The New England WTR Gathering, October 14-16
The Gathering was powerful. I drove there and back with Ruth Benn, the NWTRCC Coordinator, and we had a great conversation about the history of war tax resistance in the car ride.
The Agape Community in Ware, Massachusetts, generously opened their space for us all to meet, including finding beds for 15 of us over the course of the weekend. Friday evening and Sunday morning sessions at Agape were focused on war tax resistance stories and organizing. The theme of the weekend was how to recognize the intersections between our movements and join together in resistance to the oppressive system.
The highlight was a Saturday program in Amherst, when Joanne Sheehan (WRL New England staff in Connecticut) and Mandy Carter (a long-time community organizer and war resister from North Carolina) traveled up to lead a community event titled “Dialogue Among Resistance Movements.” There was a total of about 45 people that came for the event, including long-time war tax resisters from the area, students from nearby colleges, and community activists.
The day started with Mandy and Joanne talking about their stories and early organizing days. Mandy shared about her life story, and how we each need to be real with who we are. Mandy also talked about the organization that she helped found, Southerners On New Ground (SONG), which from the beginning has sought to support LGBTQ people of color organizing in the South.
SONG has changed over the years, shifting its power structure in order to better reflect the community. The organization started with two co-directors (one black lesbian director and one white lesbian director), and then changed to “tri-directors,” adding a Latina director. SONG also started conducting more of their meetings in Spanish and English. Examples like this helped lay the groundwork for our conversations during the rest of the day. What does a truly intersectional organizing model look like? How do we recognize shared issues and work together across lines of race, class, gender, sexuality, immigration status, and ability?
The event lasted all day long. The morning was a fishbowl discussion where four people sat together and talked while everyone in the larger circle listened. I talked in the fishbowl about being a young white queer organizer and the work that my generation is leading. I discussed how Black Lives Matter was started by three young black queer women and has been intersectional from the beginning, including demanding justice for trans people of color killed by the police along with maintaining a fierce refusal to be co-opted or silenced. I reflected on how “intersectional” and “bringing everyone to the table” doesn’t work if the power dynamics at the table means that there are some people who don’t feel safe in the space, or that they won’t actually be able to influence the decision-making because the table is rigged to begin with. In essence, does the power structure actually reflect the politics? Or is it just another feel-good measure? In addition, is “getting us at the table” just trying to get us out of the streets?
Other folks in the fishbowl talked about about “whose table is it?” and why we need to stop the “why aren’t there any young people in the room?” conversations and actually doing the work of relationship building. This very well might require changing the very nature of what the issue is that we are focusing on. Another person talked about being a working class organizer in middle class spaces, and the ways in which classism seeks to divide our movements. Yet another person shared examples from the Kurdish resistance movement, which has implemented new governance structures that are directly challenging institutional patriarchy.
In the afternoon, we broke up into five smaller discussion groups: Intersectional Models that Work, Socio-Economic Class, Personalization in the Internet Age, and White Allies. I went to the breakout groups on Socio-Economic Class and Intersectional Models that Work. The discussions were useful for noticing both when intersectional organizing has worked well and when it hasn’t.
All told, it was a great day of dialogue. And there is more to come! Stay tuned for notes from the workshop on our website as well as gatherings in 2017 that will build on the theme from this year’s New England War Tax Resistance Gathering.
— Post by Sam Koplinka-Loehr
NWTRCC Field Organizer & Outreach Consultant
4 thoughts on “Our Movements Are Connected!”
Great idea…the fishbowl. I want to try that here. I am very interested in more report backs on the intersectional models workshop, and white allies. I spent the weekend at UHURU events & they are very interested in wtr as a way of reparations for their movement.
Great! Joanne Sheehan is working to get the notes from the breakout groups typed up and will let you know when they are available. Would love to hear more about how the UHURU events went as well as WTR as reparations. Perhaps a collective redistribution of WTR for tax day for Black Lives Matter? I was talking with some folks about that via email and I think there are more conversations to be had there. I would definitely be excited to help organize it
As a person who has often asked the question “where are the young people?” I hope you Sam might represent the beginning of the end of that question. I also wonder how we can get more white haired people like Noam Chomsky involved in WTR.
If you haven’t seen the online course from Stanford university about nuclear weapons, you should take a look at it Chomsky for one thinks nuclear weapons and climate change should be on the top of our agenda.
Thanks Larry – I too hope that the WTR network will be increasingly full of young adults leading! 🙂
Comments are closed.